biblical creationism-7
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:43 am
biblical creationism-7
In the past notes, I have proposed what had happened after the antediluvian flood as what would be expected from the Biblical Creation theory. I also pointed out that the competing theories would expect there to be relative stasis among the species. Now I must describe what might be expected if Biblical Creation is true, and ways to test the theory in a scientific manner.
As presented all land life we see now were based on a generic member of each family of animals, and the maximum time that the Antediluvian flood happened was ten thousand years ago. I suggested that animals expanded to the world, changing as they expanded into the forms we now know.
We can presume that animals expanded far faster than humans did, and that all signs of human evidence (art work, crafts, structures, graves, etc.) we find were created after the Antediluvian flood.
The animals had about eight thousand years to change roughly into the forms we know, before science started cataloging them in detail.
In testing the theory of Biblical Creationism, there are many things we need to look at to find corroborating evidence for the theory. We need to deduce what would be the fastest logical rate that it would take to go from the generic KIND of animal to the most differentiated forms we now see.
One radical proponent of Catastrophic Evolution suggested that the last extinction event in the world coincided with Acidosis. Myths around the world suggests this could be about about the time the sea level dropped around that time.
I never mentioned it in previous notes, but there is evidence of sea shores 100 feet below our existing sea level. There are also evidences if sea shores a hundred feet above our existing sea levels. One suggestion was that the low sea shores were from before the flood, the high sea shores are from after the flood. it is then suggested is that the drop to present levels is when the land bridges to the continents of the world disappeared so to isolate life.
If the last mention has any sign of being true, then one can figure that the new world species and the old world species separated permanently at that time. Comparing similar forms on both sides of the ocean might give indication as to the change rate of different kinds. Any kinds that are really similar on both sides, especially if they are classified as advanced from the generic form, could well be used as a gage of the change rate of the kinds. Their differences and the amount of differences, would also be a measure of the change rate also.
We need to know the change rate of animals This would give us the latest date we would expect to find differences in remains in graves and collections. We need to do genetic and physical examinations of any animal samples whatsoever found in any tombs or graves to see if there are any detectable differences in the forms.
As mentioned, the animals spread out before mankind did. This would give them a head start in changing forms before mankind could include them in graves or tombs. Knowing the rate one can expect species to change will give us a range of likelihood that the buried remains will be different than what we see today. Would they be already fixed by the time grave sites and tombs were made, or were they changing after that time.
A drastic change from a few kinds to billions of species in ten thousand years indicates that life forms are mailable. Species might change drastically if conditions also change.
The competing theories indicate that the only real change of life forms are in size and physical necessities to handle the change in size and life style. The Hyrax, which looks like a rodent, is the closest relative of the elephant. The difference is due to the change of life style and size. Other changes are not obvious except over millions of years.
From all discussed in the past few notes, one must presume that if we see what is commonly called EVOLUTION, within the past ten thousand years, we have unquestioned proof that Biblical Creation exists.
In the past notes, I have proposed what had happened after the antediluvian flood as what would be expected from the Biblical Creation theory. I also pointed out that the competing theories would expect there to be relative stasis among the species. Now I must describe what might be expected if Biblical Creation is true, and ways to test the theory in a scientific manner.
As presented all land life we see now were based on a generic member of each family of animals, and the maximum time that the Antediluvian flood happened was ten thousand years ago. I suggested that animals expanded to the world, changing as they expanded into the forms we now know.
We can presume that animals expanded far faster than humans did, and that all signs of human evidence (art work, crafts, structures, graves, etc.) we find were created after the Antediluvian flood.
The animals had about eight thousand years to change roughly into the forms we know, before science started cataloging them in detail.
In testing the theory of Biblical Creationism, there are many things we need to look at to find corroborating evidence for the theory. We need to deduce what would be the fastest logical rate that it would take to go from the generic KIND of animal to the most differentiated forms we now see.
One radical proponent of Catastrophic Evolution suggested that the last extinction event in the world coincided with Acidosis. Myths around the world suggests this could be about about the time the sea level dropped around that time.
I never mentioned it in previous notes, but there is evidence of sea shores 100 feet below our existing sea level. There are also evidences if sea shores a hundred feet above our existing sea levels. One suggestion was that the low sea shores were from before the flood, the high sea shores are from after the flood. it is then suggested is that the drop to present levels is when the land bridges to the continents of the world disappeared so to isolate life.
If the last mention has any sign of being true, then one can figure that the new world species and the old world species separated permanently at that time. Comparing similar forms on both sides of the ocean might give indication as to the change rate of different kinds. Any kinds that are really similar on both sides, especially if they are classified as advanced from the generic form, could well be used as a gage of the change rate of the kinds. Their differences and the amount of differences, would also be a measure of the change rate also.
We need to know the change rate of animals This would give us the latest date we would expect to find differences in remains in graves and collections. We need to do genetic and physical examinations of any animal samples whatsoever found in any tombs or graves to see if there are any detectable differences in the forms.
As mentioned, the animals spread out before mankind did. This would give them a head start in changing forms before mankind could include them in graves or tombs. Knowing the rate one can expect species to change will give us a range of likelihood that the buried remains will be different than what we see today. Would they be already fixed by the time grave sites and tombs were made, or were they changing after that time.
A drastic change from a few kinds to billions of species in ten thousand years indicates that life forms are mailable. Species might change drastically if conditions also change.
The competing theories indicate that the only real change of life forms are in size and physical necessities to handle the change in size and life style. The Hyrax, which looks like a rodent, is the closest relative of the elephant. The difference is due to the change of life style and size. Other changes are not obvious except over millions of years.
From all discussed in the past few notes, one must presume that if we see what is commonly called EVOLUTION, within the past ten thousand years, we have unquestioned proof that Biblical Creation exists.
